I am not really happy with the manuscript at all, some reasons being:- Language is rather bumpy, paper needs revision by native speaker- The proposed protocol is really just a minor variation of plenty of existingprotocols, only in a slightly new context. The novelty needs to be shownmore clearly.- Simulation methodology unclear, including the statistical significance of results,or how the other considered protocols work (e.g. whether 802.11 ran with theRTS/CTS mechanism or not, and how the protocol from Reference [21] isoperating and what its configuration is).