kumoh national institute of technology
Networked Systems Lab.

Review Comment

NSL > Works@NSL> About Review> Review Comment
Enhancing Localization Accuracy in Industrial Indoor Environment using Metaheuristic Algorithm
By : Danielle Agron
Date : 2020-09-14
Views : 41

--------------- Reviews ------------------------------------

======= Review 1 =======

> *** Relevance: How well does the content fit the conference scope? Is this paper handling an important theme in this area?
Good (4)

> *** Completeness: Does this paper describe the problem clearly? Are the results of this paper reproducible via experiments (implementations, proofs)? How well is the result analysis done with the previous works? How clear is the paper's conclusion for the problem tackled?
Good (4)

> *** Originality: Does this paper include any novel approaches or new applications that have never been tried?
Average (3)

> *** Presentation: Are the title, abstract, and keywords appropriate? How proper is the organization and description method of this paper?
Average (3)

> *** Comments to authors: Please provide detailed comments to the authors.

Try to explain why the simulation is converging at a low generation size, less than 30. What is the runtime?

> *** Recommendation: Please provide your overall recommendation on the acceptance of the paper. (Final acceptance decisions will also consider literal responses to the questions below.)
Accept (4)

======= Review 2 =======

> *** Relevance: How well does the content fit the conference scope? Is this paper handling an important theme in this area?
Good (4)

> *** Completeness: Does this paper describe the problem clearly? Are the results of this paper reproducible via experiments (implementations, proofs)? How well is the result analysis done with the previous works? How clear is the paper's conclusion for the problem tackled?
Marginal (2)

> *** Originality: Does this paper include any novel approaches or new applications that have never been tried?
Marginal (2)

> *** Presentation: Are the title, abstract, and keywords appropriate? How proper is the organization and description method of this paper?
Marginal (2)

> *** Comments to authors: Please provide detailed comments to the authors.

As you know the propagation characteristic of the radio wave is very complex. Thus the log distance channel model for the sensor network model should be verified first, nevertheless [7] also used it.
And you showed the simulation performance for the just two cases, but it looks not enough to evaulate the proposed algorithm.

> *** Recommendation: Please provide your overall recommendation on the acceptance of the paper. (Final acceptance decisions will also consider literal responses to the questions below.)
Neutral (2)

======= Review 3 =======

> *** Relevance: How well does the content fit the conference scope? Is this paper handling an important theme in this area?
Good (4)

> *** Completeness: Does this paper describe the problem clearly? Are the results of this paper reproducible via experiments (implementations, proofs)? How well is the result analysis done with the previous works? How clear is the paper's conclusion for the problem tackled?
Good (4)

> *** Originality: Does this paper include any novel approaches or new applications that have never been tried?
Good (4)

> *** Presentation: Are the title, abstract, and keywords appropriate? How proper is the organization and description method of this paper?
Good (4)

> *** Comments to authors: Please provide detailed comments to the authors.

Overall, this paper is clearly written and the contribution is significant.

> *** Recommendation: Please provide your overall recommendation on the acceptance of the paper. (Final acceptance decisions will also consider literal responses to the questions below.)
Strong Accept (5)