kumoh national institute of technology
Networked Systems Lab.

Williams, "Experimental DF Joint-Relaying with MIMO-UWB for Wireless Underground Sensor Networks"
By : Williams
Date : 2020-02-10
Views : 230

09-Feb-2020

WCL2019-1628
Experimental DF Joint-Relaying with MIMO-UWB for Wireless Underground Sensor Networks
By: NWADIUGWU, WILLIAMS-PAUL; Kim, Dong-Sung


Dear Prof. Dong-Sung Kim:

The review of the referenced manuscript, WCL2019-1628, is now complete. I regret to inform you that based on the enclosed reviews and my own reading of your manuscript, I am unable to recommend its publication in IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

As you can see that the reviewers still have too many concerns about this paper. However, our journal only allows one revision. Thus, I believe that this paper is still not ready for publication and should be reject without resubmission.

The reviewers' comments are found at the end of this email.

Thank you for submitting your work to the IEEE Wireless Communications Letters. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.

Sincerely,

Dr. Chuan Huang
Editor, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters
huangch@uestc.edu.cn

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
This letter have some contribution in wireless underground sensor network, and the authors revised and improved this letter with the comments. However, it still have room to improve in writing.
1. Please uses the unit symbol such as "cm", "kHz" in Roman type rather than italic type. (i.e., $\rm{cm}$ $\rm{kHz}$ in Latex). "minimize" has the same problem.
2. Under the formula (1), in "gm(t)=p(t).hm()", '.' need to be rewritten as '' (In Latex, the symbol '' is $\cdot$).

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
See Attached File.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
The authors have taken into consideration the initial comments and have significantly improved the writing of the paper and clarified their contributions. That being said, the writing still requires improvement and some parts are still not clear. In particular, in part C of Section II.
1. The authors say i=theta, without defining either i or theta.
2. Rb is not defined.
3. Rt is not defined.
4. In Eq. (1) Nf, Tf and Ts are not defined, and also the noise term n(t) appears inside the argument of gm(t).
5. gm(t) is written as product of p(t) and hm(t), whereas I believe it should be convolution.
6. Eq. (2) is not very clear.

Finally, I recommend that the authors improve the language usage. For instance:
1. Very long sentence in the abstract.
2. p.1 l.43 assigns-> assign
3. p.1, l. 45, suggests-> suggest
4. p. 1, col 2, l. 49, that is generated->that are generated .